Online Anonymity: A luxury we can no longer afford?

The past decade has seen an increased use of virtual private networks, cryptocurrencies, whistleblowing, targeted marketing, trolling and online scams – all made possible by a perceived online anonymity. The question whether online anonymity should go the way of the dodo has been debated for some time and has again become a hot topic thanks to the influx of emails we have all received due to the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) and the introduction of the Persons with Significant Control (“PSC”) Register.

 

The pros and cons of online anonymity were debated at the recent 21st Anniversary of the International Fraud Group conference (see video above). Clearly there are two sides of this debate: those who believe right to privacy and security is paramount and those who believe disclosure to protect against abuse is paramount. However, there is actually a third angle – that anonymity in the true sense of the word is a misnomer. The real position is that, ultimately, anonymity does not exist, it’s just how much time, money and effort is required in order to discover the underlying individual. It is a divide between the rich and the poor, the powerful and the weak – with the right resources, both in an economic and expert sense, often the cloak of anonymity can be lifted.

Some would argue that one has a choice whether or not to participate in the online world and therefore voluntarily provide their personal information, however this is misguided. Whilst it is true that one can choose whether to join Facebook or Twitter or LinkedIn, one often cannot choose whether to sign up for certain websites. By way of example, lawyers require access to online legal databases for their work. Applying for jobs is now more often than not an online process. Anyone who travels knows that travel agencies are becoming a thing of the past – now nearly all travel arrangements are made via the Internet. All of these require the provision of personal data online. To live in the 21st century requires one to have an online presence.

In our experience there is no such thing as strict anonymity online. With the right combination of cyber-expertise and technological support all but the most sophisticated fraudsters are ultimately discoverable.

Keep up with the conversation in Fraud. Join our LinkedIn Group: International Fraud Group – IFG.

Keep reading

...
OffshoreAlert and IFG Partnership
We are delighted to have been invited to engage in a co-marketing Partnership with one of the industries’ most prestigious conference organisers OffshoreAlert, representing London 2023, Bangkok 2024, Miami 2024 https://www.offshorealert.com/events/ifg/ Event Information  OffshoreAlert London December 4 – 5, 2023 at the Leonardo Royal Hotel London St Paul’s 10 Godliman St., London, United Kingdom Launched
Read
...
Forteith International Symposium on Economic Crime
The International Fraud Group were delighted to sponsor the Cambridge International Symposium on Economic Crime in their 40th Year. Gary Miller, Partner and Head of Asia Desk at Mishcon de Reya LLP convened a panel on “The Impact of Culture on Fraud Investigations” and was joined by Tom Littlechild (Wells Fargo), Tyler Hodgson (The World
Read
...
A presumptuous task: interpreting “see to it” and “demand” guarantees
Guarantees have been described as the lifeblood of international commerce, but determining whether an instrument is a “see to it” or an “on demand” guarantee is not always straightforward. In this article we consider the different approaches taken by the English Commercial Court and Court of Appeal in Shanghai Shipyard Co Ltd v Reignwood International
Read
...
MUR Shipping BV v RTI Ltd: A cautionary contractual tale
In MUR Shipping BV v RTI Ltd, a decision arising in the context of a contract of affreightment, the English Court of Appeal has raised interesting questions as to the lengths commercial parties may be expected to go to in force majeure circumstances. Read the full article on Mishcon.com here.
Read