In recent years, there has been a sharp increase in the number and variety of maritime fraud cases in the international shipping and trade industry, with forms of such fraud including bunkering fraud, cargo and document fraud, chartering fraud, port-related fraud, blackmail, cyber fraud and information phishing.

The IFG Shipping division is a global network of lawyers with both contentious and non-contentious shipping and fraud experience spanning 17 jurisdictions. Our shared expertise and global reach allow us to tackle local and multi-jurisdictional complex maritime frauds and seize and recover stolen assets.

Co-Chair: Mark Davis, Mishcon de Reya LLP
Co-Chair: Prakaash Silvam, Oon & Bazul LLP

Mishcon de Reya LLP – Maritime Services

Enforcement action

Members of the IFG Shipping Group are ideally placed to assist with global asset recoveries on behalf of banks, financiers, lessors and institutional investors operating in the maritime sector, particularly in cases involving underlying allegations of fraud. With extensive experience in enforcement actions, our member firms are familiar with arrest regimes around the world and work closely together to ensure our clients achieve the best possible outcomes. Meanwhile the non-exclusive nature of our network ensures that our members have the flexibility to fully leverage their connections and relationships wherever needed.


Providing innovative and collaborative solutions to our clients, our member firms can offer access to funding for high-value asset recovery and enforcement claims through Grant Thornton’s Asset Recovery Fund II LP and MdR Solutions I, a strategic partnership between Harbour and Mishcon de Reya LLP.

Related articles

A presumptuous task: interpreting “see to it” and “demand” guarantees
Guarantees have been described as the lifeblood of international commerce, but determining whether an instrument is a “see to it” or an “on demand” guarantee is not always straightforward. In this article we consider the different approaches taken by the English Commercial Court and Court of Appeal in Shanghai Shipyard Co Ltd v Reignwood International
An inability to perform? Termination of contracts by force majeure in the context of COVID-19
In NKD Maritime Limited V Bart Maritime (No. 2) Inc the English Commercial Court considered whether a purchaser under a ship sale agreement was entitled to terminate on the basis of force majeure provisions. Our article, which you can read on here, considers the dangers of wrongful termination and best practice for drafting force
Cyprus – The Shipping Limited Liability Company Law 2022: Opportunities and Challenges
Cyprus is one of the few shipping centres worldwide which combines an international registry of recognised prestige and quality, as well as a shipping complex with a wide range of shipping and related services, as mentioned by the Shipping Deputy Minister. Despite the challenges, it has shown resilience and remains the EU’s third largest fleet
MUR Shipping BV v RTI Ltd: A cautionary contractual tale
In MUR Shipping BV v RTI Ltd, a decision arising in the context of a contract of affreightment, the English Court of Appeal has raised interesting questions as to the lengths commercial parties may be expected to go to in force majeure circumstances. Read the full article on here.